Mathematica Specifications
|
Perform engineering analysis and modeling.
Current Version
out of 2 votes
All Versions
out of 2 votes
My rating
0 stars0
Results 1–2of 2
5 stars
{ review.getRatingValue }}
"Indispensable for physics"
"Indispensable for physics"
La_VolpeSeptember 21, 2013 / Version: Mathematica 7.0
2013-09-21 16:56:43 | By La_Volpe
- Powerful symbolic mathematics- Extensive built-in numerical routines- Easily handles day-to-day mathematical tasks for me. I work for NASA as an experimental cosmologist.- For me, this is a game changer. Had mathematica been available when I was a Ph.D. student in the 1980's, my career might have taken a different path.
- Mathematica is very good, but it is not as good as a good human. It does not "see" symmetries in systems of equations. Sometimes I have to go in by hand and solve things that Mathematica cannot. When this happens, the problem at hand is usually postgraduate level or higher.- Mathematica is clumsy with tensors. When doing tensor computations, I often have to trick it to get it to do what I want. I admit that more expert users might be able to get it to work straight away.
Quick Conversion 203 |
Mathematica 203 |
Matlab 203 |
PASW Statistics 203 |
Basic Formula and Calculator 203 |
GeoGebra 203 |
Free Universal Algebra Equation Solver 203 |
Calculator.NET 203 |
MathType 203 |
MathMod 203 |